Do You Like Boobs a Lot?

I finally looked this up. Whoever she is she is not that woman!

 

Hmm, I've seen many of her photos in the past.
It's a match based on:
- face
- cup size
- piercing near left eye
- eye makeup style
Her cup size, nipple piercings, hair style, and tatoos have changed over time.
So the recent photos on her site might look like less of a match.
If you try google image search on her name you will see some older photos which are a closer match to the above.

 

That's September Carrino, no doubt about it.
_________________

BTW, I'm seeing a lot of professional model pics mixed in with the other images. How many times do I nave to remind people to edit out the pros before copying and pasting shit from other websites? Don't make excuses, just fucking do it.

 

If you take the photos on this page, I dont see a single pro. So I dont know what the hell you're talking about. If you want to make accusations like you so often do, could you at least have the decency to point to what you're basing it on? Otherwise you're just sizing yourself up for no other reason than to size yourself up. Moreover it's sloppy moderating. One might expect better.

 

Well I had obviously never heard of the woman before and I had also not seen any other photos of the woman. Looking then at that photo and the net cvollection of Ms Carrino it seemed to me that the photo looked to be of an ordinary woman with big boobs, whereas Carrino had excessively large ones. But I certainly did not look at it in such detail as you did..

 

We could say there are 2 kinds of pro photos that could slip in:

1. Photos with monogram text (Model name, set name, URL, etc.)
These should in theory be fairly easy to weed out.
But if the site thumbnail software (like imgbox which is used on this thread) always makes thumbnails the same shape,
the monogram text may get clipped off if it's a "tall" shape photo.
So you only see the monogram if you open the full size image.

2. Photos with pros, but no monogram.
Here the person who selects the photos would need to recognize the pro from past viewings.
Not always possible for every contributor, unless you have a good memory and have been viewing the pros for many years.
The backup is to have moderators or viewers who can ID a lot of pros.

There are bound to be a few pros who will slip in. The trick is to find a way to drop them back out without too much hassle.

P.S. Thanks for all your efforts to find and post photos.

 

That set has been around for years....didn't need to study it to know exactly who it was immediately....

 

But it does require that you know the person in the first place.I personally don't really care for celebs or high class models. I dont usually viswit the pro model pages, whereas I'm always on the amateur section, and yes I can see others posting well known people but I seem to be the only one who consistently gets belted by the mods. I do know who Lohan and Johansson are, but more than once someone brings up a name I'm simply not aware of. More than once it has turned out that the photo in question was merely a lookalike Salma Hayek or whatever. Phoolish, your definition of a mod sounds good, but they're too lazy to do what you suggest, or maybe theyre not lazy they just have too much to do, but they do seem to take for granted that everyone knows exactly the same amount of pros they look at on a daily basis.

 

Oh Jeez, moderators or what ever you call yourselves ( don't see any contributions from you anywhere ) give one of the most prolific contributors a break, boobs are boobs, don't care who has them. With the large amount of pictures out there one could not possibly know all ladies who show them.
Just sit back and enjoy and quit picking nits.