The Fappening - leaks discussion (don't post pics in this thread)

Where's part 2 FFS.

 

After 22 pages and couple days you folks should realize that the "event" is over.

 

Only the big one is done. There will be aftershocks for some time still. Whether it is one by one or dump by dump the rest will see the light of day one day.

 

Never heard of it before, but I am a bit hesitant to get more curious at this stage. I think the majority here are normal people who know how to browse the right sites for naked pics on the net... while it's all available on the darknet apparently but nobody wants to bring it over with a real IP.

Apparently as of yesterday, attacks on Apple were still going on: https://twitter.com/nikcub/status/506706161182048256

 

I lol'd good at this.

 

I would really like to see candice and erin's nude pics....as erin was even leonardo's girlfriend a while back(Fingers crossed).

 

Even though Candice has already done plenty of nudity, she's the one I was most excited about seeing.

 

Ha! You said it better than me.

 

Yep, me too.

On another note, half serious, based on the photos of the 2 women who claimed to be underage at the time. If the photos are of them, they actually were underage, and they sent them to someone else, were they commiting a crime (with the legal term) when they sent them?

Edit: I am referring to the celebs (eg Mckayla), not the hackers.

 

No. It's a crime to view them. It would be legal to fuck them though. 16 is adult so work that one out.

 

Looks like a group of people want to collect and leak them all. Two new censored Cuoco's out there.

 

you wouldn't steal a car. you wouldn't download a pizza.

 

I'm a bit skeptical over privacy violation claims by these actresses in view that they are willing participants in these images and those roles that many (not all) take in their films are sexualized.

To me it's more about diminishing the potential of a huge payday by signing in a movie that involves their first nude scene rather than feeling 'violated'. Take Jennifer Aniston for example. She kept hinting about doing a nude scene only to be covered (save for that cute ass shot in the Break up). These gals have lost bargaining leverage from this leak because we've seen it already.

The exception, perhaps, is Olivia Munn because it seem that those shots (if genuine) were meant for a love interest by the writing on them. That is a clear violation of an intimate relationship.

Final thought... How do we know their phones/iCloud accounts were hacked? Although that was the story, it might have been a cover to conceal real method and the photos might have collected emailed/text that used to send them to others. That itself is very risky. Let's see what the FBI turns up... the FBI involvement reinforces my belief that this is a commodity thief because if this happened to the gal next door that I see at the local store instead of the silver screen, they would just refer her to the local police...

 

IF the rumor is true that the "hacker" didn't hack at all and found them in the icloud delete bin after the ladies deleted them from their accounts, then that does possibly change it too. Well here in America (which is where jurisdiction lies for those celebs) the law is once you take your trash to the curb it's public domain and no one's breaking any laws by digging through it (you can thank the papparazzi for that one). When the FBI catches whoever did it, he can argue that since the pics were in the "digital trash" they were public domain.

At any rate, people ahve been saying for years that if you want privacy then don't keep private stuff on your computer and certainly don't upload them onto the internet (even cloud storage), so they should have used more common sense.

 

I am sure there are many people who know about this quote but it was supposedly said by one of the hackers

http://www.news.com.au/technology/d...lebs-nude-photos/story-e6frfrnr-1227044489098

 

where , post a link or pm me

 

Posting right now in proper thread.

 

Can you do this by visiting 4chan or any other website? No? Then make an argument that fits the context of this conversation, please. Your response is nonsensical.

 

lol.

I love to watch morality fights on the internet, where 99.9999999999% of all content is stolen, even when it's on the owners websites because it hasnt been properly licensed for legal online display.

Have you seen ANY website that uses "tahoma" font?

It's illegal since M$ never licensed it for online display only typeface and only for m$ office users in current licensing agreements.

As Herb said.. "EVERYTHING" you find on an online image board is "stolen". We know this, and just dont give a damn. No one on the internet does.

Oh, and btw, YES. We do intend to keep ripping movies, music, pictures, prose, ideas, and cat videos, NO. We dont care if you make $$ being the "owners" or not.