1. Guest - Remember that Thread Prefixes are a search tool! Click on a Thread Prefix and all threads with the same Prefix in that forum will be offered to you. To dismiss this notice click on X >>>
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Our gif only content threads have a rule where all thumbs must be posted as a static thumbnail that does not play. Currently imagebam made a change where they no longer produce static thumbs. Therefore, please do not use imagebam, or any host, that provides live playing gifs in those specific threads. If you see your gif playing once you post, try to use a smaller thumbnail and if that does not work use a different approved host.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Can't Log-in?. If your password is no longer accepted but the email address registered in your profile is working, use the "Forgot Your Password?" routine. However, if your registered email address is unusable, create a new temporary phun account and contact S-type.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. ATTN: Imagehost picpie is infected with the "internet security warning" redirect that tries to take users hostage with an inescapable redirect. Avoid using picpie as an imagehost.
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Too many Alerts? Why not adjust your "Alert Preferences" in your Profile Page?
    Dismiss Notice
Thread Prefixes Do not use Imagebam in GIF Content Threads Log-in issues picpie Alerts out of control?

Picture Definition/Quality.

Discussion in 'About phun.org' started by S-type, Jul 7, 2008.

  1. S-type

    S-type Remember to smile! Staff Member ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 15 Year Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Messages:
    45,790
    Likes Received:
    138,000
    I notice some folk on Phun describe the definition or "quality" of the pictures they post by specifying the actual pixel size (4k, 2048, etc.), whereas others refer to them as HQ, VHQ, UHQ, etc.. Is there a specification somewhere, if not in the wide world then at least on Phun, that relates the two methods to each other?
     
    S-type, Jul 7, 2008
    #1
  2. Taipan

    Taipan Reach Out And Touch Faith Staff Member ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 15 Year Member Original Phun Crew Phun Award Holder POLL STAR ★

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2006
    Messages:
    45,926
    Likes Received:
    166,764
    No,there isn't S.,and it's not a must to post it,more a service from the thread starter (a lot of model sites are offering different res) ;-)

    When i post a HQ,UHQ,etc. in my titles,i mostly talk about the filesize,also meant as a warning to members with very slow connections not to click the thumbs.

    For me HQ ~ 500-1000 KB
    UHQ/VHQ ~1MB & bigger
    VUHQ 3MB & bigger
     
    Taipan, Jul 7, 2008
    #2
    S-type likes this.
  3. haydaddict

    haydaddict Smiley King ★ ★ ★ ★ ☆ 15 Year Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2007
    Messages:
    74,064
    Likes Received:
    94,825
    I thought it was the resolution that matters,as the same resolution can have different size according to the compression.I for myself think UHQ for res over 2000 pxls ;)
     
    haydaddict, Jul 7, 2008
    #3
  4. TheRiver

    TheRiver temporarily a little out of order. ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 15 Year Member Original Phun Crew Movers & Shakers

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Messages:
    27,711
    Likes Received:
    106,443
    aside the fact that for me neither screen-size (pixel/inch/cm) nor resolution (dpi) isn´t automatically a criterion for quality (-> content, execution, procession etc.)

    it appears to me that here xxxQ means screen-size, a pretty familiar distinction on many websites (small, medium, large, extra large).
    there are sites with extra-large pics (~3000x6000) with a high resolution (100dpi) - average filesize of 5-7MB - not to mention some .raw-"collectors-editions" from metart (~20MB/pic).

    a blown up mag-scan doesn´t have to be of better quality than a smaller, web-published pic. most times it´s exactly the opposite.
     
    TheRiver, Jul 7, 2008
    #4
  5. Taipan

    Taipan Reach Out And Touch Faith Staff Member ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 15 Year Member Original Phun Crew Phun Award Holder POLL STAR ★

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2006
    Messages:
    45,926
    Likes Received:
    166,764
    When i convert a 100 KB .jpg to a 2.5MB .bmp,thats for sure not an UHQ (and it would not be tolerated),but that goes without saying IMHO.
    When i post a UHQ in my titles it is at least at 2-4k pixels ;-)
     
    Taipan, Jul 7, 2008
    #5
  6. S-type

    S-type Remember to smile! Staff Member ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 15 Year Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Messages:
    45,790
    Likes Received:
    138,000
    I think "quality" is debatable, as River suggests, and definition does not relate to image size - several sets I've seen recently comprised massive-sized JPG files (7k pixels on a side) but where the pictures themselves were either grainy or unfocused (or both), and consequently low optical definition!

    But I think we could usefully have an in-house specification of image size ranges - these at least are indisputable!
     
    S-type, Jul 8, 2008
    #6

Share This Page